Innovation New Jersey
  • Home
  • Our Coalition
    • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • State Supports
    • Federal Supports
    • Higher Ed Supports
  • Join Us

Innovation News

Everything Innovation. Everything New Jersey.
Follow us and stay connected.

Gray Areas in States and Local Tech Regulation

10/22/2018

0 Comments

 
Washington DC - According to Jennifer Huddleston Skees, "States and cities can promote innovation through a variety of policies that encourage innovation and entrepreneurship and serve as the test beds for disruptive technologies. However, when dealing with 50 (or more) jurisdictions trying to determine the best way to regulate or promote a new technology, it is not always as clear that state attempts to encourage innovation and embrace new technologies successfully increase consumers’ access to these technologies."
While the laboratories of democracy are wonderful for creating a variety of regulatory options, doing so can create uncertainty for innovators seeking to deploy a product nationally. This is particularly challenging for innovations in fields such as transportation, financial services, and the Internet that transcend state and even national borders by their very nature. This uncertainty, whether real or perceived, can impact innovators’ willingness to launch and to attract the necessary investors.
For example, autonomous vehicle regulation has been done primarily by states and even local governments, which could create a patchwork problem with negative impacts on further development or widespread deployment. While there have been attempts at federal legislation on the matter, even the most mundane bills have tended to stall out in the process. Critics of continuing to allow states to largely control autonomous vehicle policy point to the fact that Audi refused to deploy its most advanced driver assistance technology in the United States due to its concerns over the lack of clarity and uncertainty of current regulations.
Still, in many cases trends start to emerge where innovators and investors can know what to expect even when policies are made at the state level. Provided that regulatory norms emerge quickly, it is possible to overcome what may at first appear to be a regulatory patchwork.
Even when states are properly playing their role as a laboratory of democracy to test new policy ideas, each state does not carry an equal influence on new innovations, the market for consumers, or the attention its policies get. For example, as Brian Knight points out in his work on FinTech and other emerging financial services, New York has become a powerful de facto national regulator due to its importance to the financial system and the difficulty in launching a financial product that would want or even be able to exclude the market. Similarly, more populous states with larger economies like California, Texas, or Florida are much more likely to have the political and economic power to effectively jawbone innovators into complying with their regulations even if it means a less ideal product.
Occasionally such regulations appear to reach a tipping point for disruptive technology that is more mobile and able to engage in innovation arbitrage. For example, following aggressive and burdensome California regulations of autonomous vehicles, Uber moved all of its driverless cars to the more innovation-welcoming Arizona. As the Arizona example illustrates, states that may be perceived as “less powerful” can still develop specialization and openness to innovation that can overcome the barriers of more powerful states.
Many of these problems with patchwork regulation and unequal bargaining power can be solved at least in part by cooperation between states. States that adopt model laws or enter into interstate compacts may lose some of the competitive advantages of federalism but also reduce regulatory uncertainty. In fact, a recent FTC Economic Liberty Task Force suggested such an approach to enhancing worker mobility and entrepreneurship through occupational licensure reform. Some states, like Nebraska and Arizona, have tackled this through formal efforts like the “Occupational Board Reform Act” and the “The Right to Earn a Living Act,” which would eliminate many regulatory burdens for those choosing to come to such states to innovate. It is not unreasonable to think that given the trends already emerging in certain disruptive technologies (like autonomous vehicles and the sharing economy) where states seem to be converging on very similar regulatory schemes.
The right to innovate and the right to earn a living are closely tied, and interstate compacts or model laws may work well to solve certain patchwork problems in technologies. For example, autonomous vehicles will need to be able to travel between states with relative certainty regarding their legality and operation. This seems like an area where a model law could ensure portability of innovation. More basic technological rights, such as the right to repair, could also be addressed through an interstate compact or model law, thereby allowing consumers and innovators to know for certain what rights they have to repair or modify advanced devices from iPhones to vacuums. Model laws and interstate compacts could have the greatest impact when the policy problems are related to the portability or movement of the technology or when they go to a fundamental understanding of individual rights associated with the technology or innovation more generally.
In the end, when states are aware that while they each act as a laboratory of democracy most companies must consider broader national or international costs of compliance, they may be able to collaborate and balance out many of the perceived issues with state level regulation. In the next installment of this series, I’ll discuss what can go wrong and the consequences for innovation when state and local technology policy is not focused on promoting innovation.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Do not miss a single innovative moment and sign up for our newsletter!
    Weekly updates


    Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Academia
    Acquisitions
    Aerospace
    Agriculture
    AIDS
    Algae
    Alumni
    Animals
    Architecture
    Astrophysics
    Autism
    Awards
    Big Data
    Bioethics
    Biofuel
    Biomedical
    BioNJ
    Bioterrorism
    Bit Coins
    Brain Health
    Business
    Camden
    Cancer
    CCollege
    Cellular
    Centenary
    Chemistry
    ChooseNJ
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Tech
    Collaboration
    Computing
    Congress
    Coriell
    Council On Innovation
    Crowdfunding
    Cybersecurity
    DARPA
    Defense
    Degree
    Dementia
    Dental Health
    DOC
    DOD
    DOE
    Drew
    Drones
    Drug Creation
    Einstein's Alley
    Electricity
    Energy
    Engineering
    Entrepreneurship
    Environmental
    FAA
    Fairleigh Dickinson
    FDA
    Federal Budget
    Federal Government
    Federal Labs
    Federal Program
    Finance
    Food Science
    Fort Monmouth
    Fuel Cells
    Funding
    Genome
    Geography
    Geology
    Global Competition
    Google
    Governor Christie
    Grant
    Hackensack
    HackensackUMC
    Healthcare
    Health Care
    HHS
    HINJ
    Hospitals
    Immigration
    Incubator
    Infrastructure
    International
    Internet
    Investor
    IoT
    IP
    IT
    Jobs
    Johnson & Johnson
    K-12
    Kean
    Kessler
    Legislation
    Logistics
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Med School
    Mental Health
    Mentor
    Microorganisms
    Molecular Biology
    Montclair
    NAS
    Neuroscience
    Newark
    New Jersey
    NIFA
    NIH
    NIST
    NJBDA
    NJBIA
    NJ Chemistry Council
    NJCU
    NJDOLWD
    NJEDA
    NJEDge
    NJHF
    NJII
    NJIT
    NJMEP
    NJPAC
    NJPRO
    NJTC
    Nonprofit
    NSF
    OpEd
    Open Data
    OSHE
    OSTP
    Parasite
    Patents
    Paterson
    Patients
    Perth Amboy
    Pharma
    POTUS
    PPPL
    Princeton
    Prosthetics
    Ranking
    Rare Disease
    R&D Council
    Report
    Resiliency
    Rider
    Robotics
    Rowan
    Rutgers
    SBA
    Seton Hall
    Siemens
    Smart Car
    Smart Cities
    Software
    Solar
    Space
    SSTI
    Startup
    State Government
    STEM
    Stevens
    Stockton
    Subatomic
    Supports
    Sustainability
    Taxes
    TCNJ
    Teachers
    Telecom
    Therapy
    Thermodynamics
    Transportation
    Undergraduate
    USEDA
    Verizon
    Video Game
    Virtual Reality
    Water
    WHO
    William Paterson
    Women In STEM
    Workforce Development

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.