Innovation New Jersey
  • Home
  • Our Coalition
    • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • State Supports
    • Federal Supports
    • Higher Ed Supports
  • Join Us

Innovation News

Everything Innovation. Everything New Jersey.
Follow us and stay connected.

Brookings TechTank: Science Policy Positions Reveal Clinton’s and Trump’s Views of America

6/24/2016

0 Comments

 
Washington, DC ― Jack Karsten and Darrell M. West posted on the Brookings TechTank that, with decisive wins on June 7 in California, New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota, Hillary Clinton became the presumptive Democratic Party nominee.  
 
The stage is now set for a showdown with presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump as they shift their focus to the November general election.
 
This shift brings closer examination of the two candidates’ stances on critical policy issues. Though rarely a talking point, science policy has managed to glean some attention in the primary season’s deluge of debates, town hall meetings, and press releases.  
 
Given the historical benefits of scientific research, science policy must be incorporated into the general election discussion.
 
Both candidates find immense value in science and continued research and funding. 
​In a town hall last year, Clinton stated that U.S. investment in science and research has been “one of the great advantages we have had over the last 70 years” and went on to say it is a “huge economic boon.”
 
Trump stated “I think it’s wonderful” when asked about space travel and putting a person on Mars.
 
However, the similarities end there.
 
As science funding continues to be cut, and often ignored, each candidate has taken a decidedly different stance on this issue, signifying a fundamental difference between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
 
Hillary Clinton has remained committed to science and research funding.  She sees science as a tool, capable of creating solutions for many current issues.  Clinton has proposed increased funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation as a part of her plan to raise American incomes.
 
Furthermore, Clinton recognizes the impact of climate change and would continue initiatives started by President Obama.  In keeping with her stance during her 2008 campaign, Clinton supports NASA, stating “Nobody is as innovative, creative, and smart about taking research…and translating [it] into commercial and economic activities.”
 
Donald Trump remains enthusiastic about scientific discovery, specifically in regards to NASA and private sector space travel.
 
However, his enthusiasm for NASA has not translated into calls to increase funding for the agency.  Trump states that “we have bigger problems,” such as crumbling infrastructure and ISIS, which must be addressed before increasing funding for NASA.
 
Trump intends to focus funding directly on finding the solutions to current issues, such as “fix[ing] our potholes,” and would utilize excess funds to support science since “we don’t exactly have a lot of money.”
 
Similar to his former Republican opponents, Trump denies the impact of climate change.  It remains “very low on the list” of his priorities, as he is more concerned with the threat of nuclear war.
 
Trump eventually went so far as to say he would cut the Environmental Protection Agency.
 
These differences in policy indicate a drastic distinction between the two candidates and their views on the current condition of the United States.  
 
Hillary Clinton recognizes that the country faces major issues, but she envisions a future where science plays a critical role in making America stronger.
 
In stark contrast, Donald Trump sees the U.S. on the brink of catastrophic decline.  Focused on the present, Trump’s commitment to current issues rather than science funding suggests that the country must first be saved before it can work towards a more prosperous and scientific future.
 
Together, these two standpoints challenge the role of science in American society.  When faced with major challenges, the U.S. has rarely looked to science directly, opting instead for more direct solutions through military, economic, or social actions.
 
While often difficult to justify in the short term, applied and theoretical scientific research regularly has widespread impact on current and future challenges.  Scientific research by NASA, NIH, national labs, and universities has created its own surprising solutions to difficult problems.
 
From solar power to wireless communications, nuclear energy to the internet, science research has helped shape the modern world.  Ultimately, candidates must successfully balance solving imminent challenges with the need for continued scientific exploration to create a successful present and prosperous future.
 
Jacob Lineberry contributed to this post.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Do not miss a single innovative moment and sign up for our newsletter!
    Weekly updates


    Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Academia
    Acquisitions
    Aerospace
    Agriculture
    AIDS
    Algae
    Alumni
    Animals
    Architecture
    Astrophysics
    Autism
    Awards
    Big Data
    Bioethics
    Biofuel
    Biomedical
    BioNJ
    Bioterrorism
    Bit Coins
    Brain Health
    Business
    Camden
    Cancer
    CCollege
    Cellular
    Centenary
    Chemistry
    ChooseNJ
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Tech
    Collaboration
    Computing
    Congress
    Coriell
    Council On Innovation
    Crowdfunding
    Cybersecurity
    DARPA
    Defense
    Degree
    Dementia
    Dental Health
    DOC
    DOD
    DOE
    Drew
    Drones
    Drug Creation
    Einstein's Alley
    Electricity
    Energy
    Engineering
    Entrepreneurship
    Environmental
    FAA
    Fairleigh Dickinson
    FDA
    Federal Budget
    Federal Government
    Federal Labs
    Federal Program
    Finance
    Food Science
    Fort Monmouth
    Fuel Cells
    Funding
    Genome
    Geography
    Geology
    Global Competition
    Google
    Governor Christie
    Grant
    Hackensack
    HackensackUMC
    Healthcare
    Health Care
    HHS
    HINJ
    Hospitals
    Immigration
    Incubator
    Infrastructure
    International
    Internet
    Investor
    IoT
    IP
    IT
    Jobs
    Johnson & Johnson
    K-12
    Kean
    Kessler
    Legislation
    Logistics
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Med School
    Mental Health
    Mentor
    Microorganisms
    Molecular Biology
    Montclair
    NAS
    Neuroscience
    Newark
    New Jersey
    NIFA
    NIH
    NIST
    NJBDA
    NJBIA
    NJ Chemistry Council
    NJCU
    NJDOLWD
    NJEDA
    NJEDge
    NJHF
    NJII
    NJIT
    NJMEP
    NJPAC
    NJPRO
    NJTC
    Nonprofit
    NSF
    OpEd
    Open Data
    OSHE
    OSTP
    Parasite
    Patents
    Paterson
    Patients
    Perth Amboy
    Pharma
    POTUS
    PPPL
    Princeton
    Prosthetics
    Ranking
    Rare Disease
    R&D Council
    Report
    Resiliency
    Rider
    Robotics
    Rowan
    Rutgers
    SBA
    Seton Hall
    Siemens
    Smart Car
    Smart Cities
    Software
    Solar
    Space
    SSTI
    Startup
    State Government
    STEM
    Stevens
    Stockton
    Subatomic
    Supports
    Sustainability
    Taxes
    TCNJ
    Teachers
    Telecom
    Therapy
    Thermodynamics
    Transportation
    Undergraduate
    USEDA
    Verizon
    Video Game
    Virtual Reality
    Water
    WHO
    William Paterson
    Women In STEM
    Workforce Development

Home   Coalition   News   Resources   Events   Join Us
Picture
Innovation New Jersey Coalition
10 West Lafayette Street
Trenton, NJ 08608-2002
609-858-9507