Innovation New Jersey
  • Home
  • Our Coalition
    • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • State Supports
    • Federal Supports
    • Higher Ed Supports
  • Join Us

Innovation News

Everything Innovation. Everything New Jersey.
Follow us and stay connected.

Can economic and historical analyses end copyright law’s property/monopoly disputes? AEI explains

11/30/2015

0 Comments

 
Washington D.C. - According to the American Enterprise Institute, "For more than 300 years, copyright law and policy have been plagued by recurring debates: are copyrights private property rights, or are they suspect, government-granted monopoly rights? This paper examines three modern versions of these property-or-monopoly debates. In each case, it concludes that copyrights are best understood as private property rights—pragmatically indistinguishable from other private property rights that generate imperfect, competition by innovation among producers of other differentiated goods or services."
On September 5, 2014, America’s Future Foundation hosted a debate on Capitol Hill titled “Is Copyright a Property Right?” A similar debate could have been held in Great Britain in 1714. For 300 years, the question of whether copyrights are property rights or a sui generis form of government-granted monopoly right has been bitterly contested. This paper argues that these recurring disputes can now be resolved for two reasons.
First, modern economics no longer provides a basis for distinguishing between the economic effects of the copyrights of private producers of expressive works and the economic effects of the real, personal, and intellectual property rights of private producers of most other potentially valuable goods and services. All of those exclusive rights tend to drive self-catalyzing processes of productive, entrepreneurial innovation that result in imperfect competition among producers of differentiated goods, services, or works. Consequently, those still hurling the epithet “monopoly” at the copyrights of successful creators and creative industries are implicitly flinging the same rhetorical dagger at essentially all other entrepreneurial creators of other differentiated products and services.
​
Second, some analysts have recently advocated a new variant of the copyrights-are-monopolies argument that could be called the “founders’-copyright critique” of current US copyright laws. This critique claims that special-interest lobbying has caused modern copyright laws to betray an allegedly traditional, highly skeptical, limited approach to copyright protection first adopted by the founders of the United States and the framers of the Constitution.

But this critique is just wrong. The founders and framers actually believed that promoting private speech by protecting copyrights was a fundamental duty of a civilized, democratic nation. Consequently, founders and framers such as George Washington and James Madison moved so swiftly to protect copyrights that the United States enacted world history’s first market-based national copyright law—the first to treat the copyrights of authors as market-generating private property rights.

Together, these economic and historical analyses can help end centuries of debates about the nature of copyrights. Copyrights can no longer be fairly characterized as sui generis government-granted monopoly rights. They are property rights that tend to generate, among creators of expressive works, the same sort of imperfect competition by innovation that drives growth and progress throughout the most vibrant, productive sectors of our market economy.

For example, tonight, many Americans may watch a TV show or movie on a tablet computer. One such person might use Verizon Internet-access services, a Linksys WiFi access point, an Apple iPad, Google Search, a Netflix subscription, or Akamai-like caching services—all to enjoy a work created and owned by the Walt Disney Company. Legally enforceable exclusive rights enable all those entities to make their contributions to that routine event. And none of those rights are just government-granted monopoly rights—not even the copyrights of the Walt Disney Company.

For more than 300 years, reasoned analysis of copyright law and policy has been obstructed by recurring disputes about whether copyrights are “private property rights” or sui generis “government-granted monopoly rights.” Understanding why and how we could now resolve copyright law’s property/monopoly disputes requires some familiarity with their long, international history.[1] The following summary is not intended to acknowledge all the contributions made by many thoughtful scholars, analysts, and institutions during centuries of such disputes. Rather, it is intended to explain two historical facts: (1) copyright law’s property/monopoly disputes have scarcely changed over centuries in which our understanding of economics and market competition has changed fundamentally; and (2) these disputes have focused on applying the competing labels “property” and “monopoly” to copyrights.

 Read the full report.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Do not miss a single innovative moment and sign up for our newsletter!
    Weekly updates


    Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Academia
    Acquisitions
    Aerospace
    Agriculture
    AIDS
    Algae
    Alumni
    Animals
    Architecture
    Astrophysics
    Autism
    Awards
    Big Data
    Bioethics
    Biofuel
    Biomedical
    BioNJ
    Bioterrorism
    Bit Coins
    Brain Health
    Business
    Camden
    Cancer
    CCollege
    Cellular
    Centenary
    Chemistry
    ChooseNJ
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Tech
    Collaboration
    Computing
    Congress
    Coriell
    Council On Innovation
    Crowdfunding
    Cybersecurity
    DARPA
    Defense
    Degree
    Dementia
    Dental Health
    DOC
    DOD
    DOE
    Drew
    Drones
    Drug Creation
    Einstein's Alley
    Electricity
    Energy
    Engineering
    Entrepreneurship
    Environmental
    FAA
    Fairleigh Dickinson
    FDA
    Federal Budget
    Federal Government
    Federal Labs
    Federal Program
    Finance
    Food Science
    Fort Monmouth
    Fuel Cells
    Funding
    Genome
    Geography
    Geology
    Global Competition
    Google
    Governor Christie
    Grant
    Hackensack
    HackensackUMC
    Healthcare
    Health Care
    HHS
    HINJ
    Hospitals
    Immigration
    Incubator
    Infrastructure
    International
    Internet
    Investor
    IoT
    IP
    IT
    Jobs
    Johnson & Johnson
    K-12
    Kean
    Kessler
    Legislation
    Logistics
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Med School
    Mental Health
    Mentor
    Microorganisms
    Molecular Biology
    Montclair
    NAS
    Neuroscience
    Newark
    New Jersey
    NIFA
    NIH
    NIST
    NJBDA
    NJBIA
    NJ Chemistry Council
    NJCU
    NJDOLWD
    NJEDA
    NJEDge
    NJHF
    NJII
    NJIT
    NJMEP
    NJPAC
    NJPRO
    NJTC
    Nonprofit
    NSF
    OpEd
    Open Data
    OSHE
    OSTP
    Parasite
    Patents
    Paterson
    Patients
    Perth Amboy
    Pharma
    POTUS
    PPPL
    Princeton
    Prosthetics
    Ranking
    Rare Disease
    R&D Council
    Report
    Resiliency
    Rider
    Robotics
    Rowan
    Rutgers
    SBA
    Seton Hall
    Siemens
    Smart Car
    Smart Cities
    Software
    Solar
    Space
    SSTI
    Startup
    State Government
    STEM
    Stevens
    Stockton
    Subatomic
    Supports
    Sustainability
    Taxes
    TCNJ
    Teachers
    Telecom
    Therapy
    Thermodynamics
    Transportation
    Undergraduate
    USEDA
    Verizon
    Video Game
    Virtual Reality
    Water
    WHO
    William Paterson
    Women In STEM
    Workforce Development

Home   Coalition   News   Resources   Events   Join Us
Picture
Innovation New Jersey Coalition
10 West Lafayette Street
Trenton, NJ 08608-2002
609-858-9507