Innovation New Jersey
  • Home
  • Our Coalition
    • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • State Supports
    • Federal Supports
    • Higher Ed Supports
  • Join Us

Innovation News

Everything Innovation. Everything New Jersey.
Follow us and stay connected.

Op-Ed: NJ Assn. of State Colleges and Universities’ Dr. Michael Klein Urges ‘Modernize Contracts Laws for NJ’s State Colleges, Universities’

8/18/2017

0 Comments

 
Trenton, NJ — NJ Spotlight on August 14 published the following op-ed by Michael W. Klein, J.D., Ph.D., executive director of the New Jersey Association of State Colleges and Universities: 
 
The ideal college, according to President James Garfield, was having Mark Hopkins, the president of Williams College from 1836 to 1872, “on one end of a log and a student on the other.”  
 
Times have changed a bit since Garfield graduated from Williams in 1856. To be sure, professors and their classrooms are important, but so too are libraries, laboratories, computers, and high-speed connections to the Internet.  All colleges need these types of facilities and equipment, and they try to get the best price from the most responsible vendor or contractor. 

​But in New Jersey, the rules that public four-year colleges and universities follow to purchase goods and services, or construct a building, depend on how the institution is categorized under the law.  
​This differentiation no longer makes sense. It is time to abolish the State College Contracts Law — which applies to seven institutions — and replace it with the same rules followed by public-research universities.
 
New Jersey divides public four-year institutions of higher education into two categories:
 
(1) State colleges and universities, which include The College of New Jersey, Kean University, New Jersey City University, Ramapo College, Stockton University, Thomas Edison State University, and William Paterson University; and
 
(2) Public research universities, which include Rutgers University, the New Jersey Institute of Technology, Rowan University, and Montclair State University.
 
A law signed by Gov. Chris Christie on July 21, 2017 re-designated Montclair State from a state university to a public research university.
 
In addition to recognizing the growth in Montclair State’s doctoral-level education and research, the law provided the university with the same rules for construction and procurement as NJIT and Rowan (Rutgers has a distinctive status under the Rutgers Compact of 1956 that gives it greater autonomy and authority.)
 
Seven institutions are left straining against the State College Contracts Law, which was enacted in 1986 and was last amended in 2006. Even though the public research universities and the state colleges and universities buy and build the same things, the rules they follow for procurement and construction differ in the following significant ways.
 
Bidding Procedures: Lowest Price
 
Under the law, public research universities award contracts to a “responsible bidder whose bid, conforming to the invitation for bids, will be most advantageous to the university, price and other factors considered.”
 
Those “other factors” are the key. They can include past performance of construction projects at the institution. If a contractor puts in leaky windows on one project and then submits the lowest bid on another project, a public research institution does not need to hire that contractor again.
 
Not so for the state colleges and universities. For construction projects, they must award contracts “to the lowest responsible bidder whose bid, conforming to the invitation for bids, will be the most advantageous to the State college.”
 
The law does not allow colleges to consider “other factors” beyond price.  So, the contractor who installs leaky windows can win the bid for the next project by submitting the lowest price. The price will increase, of course, when new windows must be installed.
 
Bidding Procedure: General Contractor, Subcontracts
 
The state colleges and universities have only three options when it comes to construction: hiring a single contractor; getting bids on five specific subcontracts (plumbing and gas fitting; refrigeration, heating and ventilation; electrical work; structural steel and ornamental iron work; and general construction); or combining the single contractor with the five specific subcontracts.
 
Public research universities can enter more creative and cost-effective types of construction contracts that meet the needs of the project.
 
Examples include design-build contracts, under which a single entity performs both architectural/engineering services and construction under one contract; and construction-manager-at-risk contracts, under which a construction firm is selected as construction manager and general contractor at the beginning of the design phase.
 
The design-build method allows institutions to have one point of contact for the entire project, saving time and money; and streamline and save costs on specialized projects, such as science labs and cogeneration facilities.
 
Benefits from construction-manager-at-risk contracts include working closely with the project’s architect to examine alternative materials, systems, and equipment for cost, quality and availability; and coordinating subcontractor bids and determining a guaranteed maximum price for construction.
 
Equally important, design-build and construction-manager-at-risk contracts afford the same accountability as the state colleges’ more stringent approaches. The public research institutions still adhere to public bidding and transparency.
 
Procurement of Goods and Services
 
The basic economic principal of supply and demand explains that buyers can get a lower price for goods or services if they enter a long-term contract. The public research universities have no limits on the length of contracts they enter, allowing them to negotiate the best deal possible.
 
The state colleges and universities, however, can generally enter a contract for no longer than three years.  
 
They can enter longer terms for items such as utilities, information technology, insurance, and leases for vehicles and equipment (five-year maximums); energy conservation services (up to 10 years); and management and operation of bookstores, performing arts centers, residence halls, parking facilities and building operations (up to 30 years).
 
Putting a limit on the length of a contract puts a limit on the ability of the state colleges to negotiate the best price.
 
Change an Anachronistic Law
 
The last significant changes to the State College Contracts Law were enacted in January 2006, when Gov. Richard Codey signed legislation we worked on for two years with the legislature.
 
Those amendments included increasing the bid threshold for contracts that do not require board approval (the bill increased the threshold from $17,700 to $26,200, which has risen under an inflation-adjustment escalator clause to $33,000 today); replacing the phrase “data processing software programs, systems and service” with “information technology;” lengthening the maximum term for contracts for services such as fuel, snow removal, garbage collection, and food service from three years to five years; and allowing multiyear contracts for banking services and building maintenance (five-year maximums).
 
During that legislative effort in 2004-2005, the state colleges and universities almost got the authority to enter design-build and construction-manager-at-risk contracts. The Assembly approved those provisions, but the Senate deleted them from the bill.
 
Continuing to tweak the State College Contracts Law is one possible option for the state colleges and universities. Seeking amendments to allow design-build and construction-manager-at-risk, and increasing the bid threshold to a reasonable level like $50,000 (which is the threshold above which Rutgers University “will seek formal competition between multiple suppliers”), would provide greater cost-efficiency and effectiveness.
 
A better route would be eliminating the 31-year-old State College Contracts Law and implementing the same contracting standards among New Jersey’s 11 public four-year colleges and universities.
 
The State College Contracts Law pertains only to the seven state colleges and universities, while the public research universities follow more flexible and reasonable requirements that maintain transparency and accountability.
 
It makes no sense to have different procurement and construction standards for “public research universities” and “state colleges and universities” when all 11 institutions are buying the same types of goods and services, and constructing the same types of buildings.
 
If you were sitting at the opposite end of a log from Williams College President Mark Hopkins sometime in the 1800s, he no doubt would have told you so.
 
 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Do not miss a single innovative moment and sign up for our newsletter!
    Weekly updates


    Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Academia
    Acquisitions
    Aerospace
    Agriculture
    AIDS
    Algae
    Alumni
    Animals
    Architecture
    Astrophysics
    Autism
    Awards
    Big Data
    Bioethics
    Biofuel
    Biomedical
    BioNJ
    Bioterrorism
    Bit Coins
    Brain Health
    Business
    Camden
    Cancer
    CCollege
    Cellular
    Centenary
    Chemistry
    ChooseNJ
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Tech
    Collaboration
    Computing
    Congress
    Coriell
    Council On Innovation
    Crowdfunding
    Cybersecurity
    DARPA
    Defense
    Degree
    Dementia
    Dental Health
    DOC
    DOD
    DOE
    Drew
    Drones
    Drug Creation
    Einstein's Alley
    Electricity
    Energy
    Engineering
    Entrepreneurship
    Environmental
    FAA
    Fairleigh Dickinson
    FDA
    Federal Budget
    Federal Government
    Federal Labs
    Federal Program
    Finance
    Food Science
    Fort Monmouth
    Fuel Cells
    Funding
    Genome
    Geography
    Geology
    Global Competition
    Google
    Governor Christie
    Grant
    Hackensack
    HackensackUMC
    Health Care
    Healthcare
    HHS
    HINJ
    Hospitals
    Immigration
    Incubator
    Infrastructure
    International
    Internet
    Investor
    IoT
    IP
    IT
    Jobs
    Johnson & Johnson
    K-12
    Kean
    Kessler
    Legislation
    Logistics
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Med School
    Mental Health
    Mentor
    Microorganisms
    Molecular Biology
    Montclair
    NAS
    Neuroscience
    Newark
    New Jersey
    NIFA
    NIH
    NIST
    NJBDA
    NJBIA
    NJ Chemistry Council
    NJCU
    NJDOLWD
    NJEDA
    NJEDge
    NJHF
    NJII
    NJIT
    NJMEP
    NJPAC
    NJPRO
    NJTC
    Nonprofit
    NSF
    OpEd
    Open Data
    OSHE
    OSTP
    Parasite
    Patents
    Paterson
    Patients
    Perth Amboy
    Pharma
    POTUS
    PPPL
    Princeton
    Prosthetics
    Ranking
    Rare Disease
    R&D Council
    Report
    Resiliency
    Rider
    Robotics
    Rowan
    Rutgers
    SBA
    Seton Hall
    Siemens
    Smart Car
    Smart Cities
    Software
    Solar
    Space
    SSTI
    Startup
    State Government
    STEM
    Stevens
    Stockton
    Subatomic
    Supports
    Sustainability
    Taxes
    TCNJ
    Teachers
    Telecom
    Therapy
    Thermodynamics
    Transportation
    Undergraduate
    USEDA
    Verizon
    Video Game
    Virtual Reality
    Water
    WHO
    William Paterson
    Women In STEM
    Workforce Development

Home   Coalition   News   Resources   Events   Join Us
Picture
Innovation New Jersey Coalition
10 West Lafayette Street
Trenton, NJ 08608
732-729-9619