Innovation New Jersey
  • Home
  • Our Coalition
    • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • State Supports
    • Federal Supports
    • Higher Ed Supports
  • Join Us

Innovation News

Everything Innovation. Everything New Jersey.
Follow us and stay connected.

Opinion: Former Congressman and AAAS CEO Rush Holt: Lawmakers Need to Use a Scientific Approach to Formulating Views

1/6/2017

0 Comments

 
Washington, DC — Rush Holt, a physicist who serves as the CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), executive publisher of the Science family of journals, and former New Jersey Congressman, writes in The Star-Ledger:
 
Throughout this election cycle, and certainly since Election Day, many Americans are wondering whether what binds us together can overcome what divides us politically.  Indeed, it is no exaggeration to say that many of our fellow citizens are feeling more estranged from their countrymen and their government than they ever have.
 
Rightly, both President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump have emphasized the need for Americans to act as one team and unify our great country.  But that is no easy task.
 
How does one compromise on a dearly held position? How does one settle for a partial solution when she believes only a total solution will work? How does one treat another person's perspective with validity if he believes there is no factual basis for it?
 
There is no easy answer to these questions, of course. But there is one thing that can be, and must be, part of the solution: science.
​As a scientist and former U.S. congressman, I have a unique perspective on the role that science should play in a democracy. Science is not apart from self-governance, or adjacent to it. It is essential to it.
 
Though science gets a great deal of credit for advancing our understanding of the world, it gets too little credit for its foundational quality: humility in the face of evidence.  That's not to say that scientists don't have egos, because we do, just like anyone else.
 
But what makes science science - publicly presenting facts and reasoning, subjecting ideas to rigorous criticism, and many rounds of testing to confirm or overturn theories - is premised upon a willingness to be proved wrong. We need more of that in our politics.
 
I recognize, of course, that policymaking does not take place in a laboratory.  I am not suggesting that science should be the only factor that lawmakers consider.
 
But when it comes to the factual basis lawmakers use to inform their policy views, and to decide on a process for evaluating whether a particular policy has worked or failed, science should be the tool of first resort.
 
The stakes for our democracy are high. Many Americans are fearful that our elected leaders have forgotten how to find common ground, or don't want to, and that they continue to make assertions in disregard for each other.
 
A scientific approach to formulating views and evaluating policies will provide politicians what they need to hone their proposals and, perhaps, walk back from some of their previous positions.
 
That's not easy — I know, I've been there — but political arguments must resolve into policy choices at some point.  Those choices should be pragmatic and informed by hard evidence and sound reasoning.
 
The stakes for our planet are high.  We know, based on the work and expertise of the vast majority of climate scientists and virtually every leading scientific organization in the world, that human-caused climate change is real and dangerous. It is folly to ignore this scientific consensus - obstinate and irresponsible in the extreme.
 
And yet, a climate-change doubter has been put forward as the possible head of the Environmental Protection Agency in the next administration.  
 
There is no reason for such an appointment when there are scientists of every political stripe who adhere to the scientific method, have the humility to accept when they are wrong, and would be willing to serve their country if asked by an incoming president.
 
I urge the president-elect and every incoming member of Congress to make use of the country's deep pool of talented scientists to serve as political appointees, staff members and outside experts.
 
Our Founding Fathers saw understanding and hope in science. They sought not only to encourage the pursuit of science and to protect it in the Constitution (which they did), but also, they hoped to infuse our society with the benefits of science. We have benefited mightily from their wisdom.
 
As the head of the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society, which has led since 1848 and thus has endured countless shifting political winds, I have an obligation to stand up for the scientific process and to advocate for fidelity to science in all areas of policymaking.
 
We need science on an ongoing basis for reaching the best conclusions that tested knowledge can inform.
 
The range of issues on which science is relevant is infinite.  My plea to our leaders is short: May they commit to using science to inform their policy views, and may they have the humility to accept the results.
 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Do not miss a single innovative moment and sign up for our newsletter!
    Weekly updates


    Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Academia
    Acquisitions
    Aerospace
    Agriculture
    AIDS
    Algae
    Alumni
    Animals
    Architecture
    Astrophysics
    Autism
    Awards
    Big Data
    Bioethics
    Biofuel
    Biomedical
    BioNJ
    Bioterrorism
    Bit Coins
    Brain Health
    Business
    Camden
    Cancer
    CCollege
    Cellular
    Centenary
    Chemistry
    ChooseNJ
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Tech
    Collaboration
    Computing
    Congress
    Coriell
    Council On Innovation
    Crowdfunding
    Cybersecurity
    DARPA
    Defense
    Degree
    Dementia
    Dental Health
    DOC
    DOD
    DOE
    Drew
    Drones
    Drug Creation
    Einstein's Alley
    Electricity
    Energy
    Engineering
    Entrepreneurship
    Environmental
    FAA
    Fairleigh Dickinson
    FDA
    Federal Budget
    Federal Government
    Federal Labs
    Federal Program
    Finance
    Food Science
    Fort Monmouth
    Fuel Cells
    Funding
    Genome
    Geography
    Geology
    Global Competition
    Google
    Governor Christie
    Grant
    Hackensack
    HackensackUMC
    Healthcare
    Health Care
    HHS
    HINJ
    Hospitals
    Immigration
    Incubator
    Infrastructure
    International
    Internet
    Investor
    IoT
    IP
    IT
    Jobs
    Johnson & Johnson
    K-12
    Kean
    Kessler
    Legislation
    Logistics
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Med School
    Mental Health
    Mentor
    Microorganisms
    Molecular Biology
    Montclair
    NAS
    Neuroscience
    Newark
    New Jersey
    NIFA
    NIH
    NIST
    NJBDA
    NJBIA
    NJ Chemistry Council
    NJCU
    NJDOLWD
    NJEDA
    NJEDge
    NJHF
    NJII
    NJIT
    NJMEP
    NJPAC
    NJPRO
    NJTC
    Nonprofit
    NSF
    OpEd
    Open Data
    OSHE
    OSTP
    Parasite
    Patents
    Paterson
    Patients
    Perth Amboy
    Pharma
    POTUS
    PPPL
    Princeton
    Prosthetics
    Ranking
    Rare Disease
    R&D Council
    Report
    Resiliency
    Rider
    Robotics
    Rowan
    Rutgers
    SBA
    Seton Hall
    Siemens
    Smart Car
    Smart Cities
    Software
    Solar
    Space
    SSTI
    Startup
    State Government
    STEM
    Stevens
    Stockton
    Subatomic
    Supports
    Sustainability
    Taxes
    TCNJ
    Teachers
    Telecom
    Therapy
    Thermodynamics
    Transportation
    Undergraduate
    USEDA
    Verizon
    Video Game
    Virtual Reality
    Water
    WHO
    William Paterson
    Women In STEM
    Workforce Development

Home   Coalition   News   Resources   Events   Join Us
Picture
Innovation New Jersey Coalition
222 West State Street
Suite 302
Trenton, NJ 08608
732-729-9619