Innovation New Jersey
  • Home
  • Our Coalition
    • Contact Us
  • News
  • Resources
    • State Supports
    • Federal Supports
    • Higher Ed Supports
  • Join Us

Innovation News

Everything Innovation. Everything New Jersey.
Follow us and stay connected.

SSTI: Study Finds Science Literacy Needs Definition, Does Not Affect Attitudes

8/26/2016

0 Comments

 
​Westerville, OH ― Jason Rittenberg reports on the State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) news blog that a recent National Institutes of Health-funded study by the National Academy of Sciences identifies how “science literacy” has been defined in research and the role this construct plays in attitudes about scientific research and funding.
 
The 138-page report finds that science literacy has been measured many different ways but that the concept does not seem to directly affect attitudes toward science generally or in specific subjects.
 
“Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences” investigates 20 definitions of science literacy used in various studies, as well as numerous definitions of potentially-related constructs, and determines that the term is not well-defined in the literature.
 
Despite noting that the “predominant conception” of science literacy has been individual knowledge, the authors want the term to include appreciation for a broader set of process-related concepts, such as peer review.
​The lack of a consistent definition of “science literacy” does not itself spell trouble for science and research.
 
The report notes that global attitudes toward science and research funding are generally positive, a finding that was also evident in a recent polling project by SSTI. However we want to talk about science, people will largely embrace the conversation.
 
In fact, a high baseline of support may be part of the reason why science literacy does not seem to affect attitudes very strongly—a limited marginal opportunity for improvement provides few opportunities to observe effects.
 
Another factor affecting the importance of science literacy is that attitudes toward controversial types of science, including nuclear power, climate change and genetically modified foods, appear to be controlled more by other values and beliefs than by support for science.
 
Taken together, the report suggests that science literacy is prevalent but relatively unimportant to individuals—and is therefore also insignificant as a channel for influencing broader attitudes or actions.
 
A reasonable reader might wonder if “science literacy” has been measured in a variety of structures and appears to have little bearing on public support, does the definition matter? The short answer is maybe.
 
Academics need clear constructs to fairly compare methodologies and results, and public support for a policy can vary greatly depending on the exact language used. In this sense, the lack of a common definition of “science literacy” is something to be sorted out through further research—or addressed through deliberate policy and communications work.
 
For the rest of Jason Rittenberg’s report, click here.
 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Do not miss a single innovative moment and sign up for our newsletter!
    Weekly updates


    Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Academia
    Acquisitions
    Aerospace
    Agriculture
    AIDS
    Algae
    Alumni
    Animals
    Architecture
    Astrophysics
    Autism
    Awards
    Big Data
    Bioethics
    Biofuel
    Biomedical
    BioNJ
    Bioterrorism
    Bit Coins
    Brain Health
    Business
    Camden
    Cancer
    CCollege
    Cellular
    Centenary
    Chemistry
    ChooseNJ
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Tech
    Collaboration
    Computing
    Congress
    Coriell
    Council On Innovation
    Crowdfunding
    Cybersecurity
    DARPA
    Defense
    Degree
    Dementia
    Dental Health
    DOC
    DOD
    DOE
    Drew
    Drones
    Drug Creation
    Einstein's Alley
    Electricity
    Energy
    Engineering
    Entrepreneurship
    Environmental
    FAA
    Fairleigh Dickinson
    FDA
    Federal Budget
    Federal Government
    Federal Labs
    Federal Program
    Finance
    Food Science
    Fort Monmouth
    Fuel Cells
    Funding
    Genome
    Geography
    Geology
    Global Competition
    Google
    Governor Christie
    Grant
    Hackensack
    HackensackUMC
    Healthcare
    Health Care
    HHS
    HINJ
    Hospitals
    Immigration
    Incubator
    Infrastructure
    International
    Internet
    Investor
    IoT
    IP
    IT
    Jobs
    Johnson & Johnson
    K-12
    Kean
    Kessler
    Legislation
    Logistics
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Med School
    Mental Health
    Mentor
    Microorganisms
    Molecular Biology
    Montclair
    NAS
    Neuroscience
    Newark
    New Jersey
    NIFA
    NIH
    NIST
    NJBDA
    NJBIA
    NJ Chemistry Council
    NJCU
    NJDOLWD
    NJEDA
    NJEDge
    NJHF
    NJII
    NJIT
    NJMEP
    NJPAC
    NJPRO
    NJTC
    Nonprofit
    NSF
    OpEd
    Open Data
    OSHE
    OSTP
    Parasite
    Patents
    Paterson
    Patients
    Perth Amboy
    Pharma
    POTUS
    PPPL
    Princeton
    Prosthetics
    Ranking
    Rare Disease
    R&D Council
    Report
    Resiliency
    Rider
    Robotics
    Rowan
    Rutgers
    SBA
    Seton Hall
    Siemens
    Smart Car
    Smart Cities
    Software
    Solar
    Space
    SSTI
    Startup
    State Government
    STEM
    Stevens
    Stockton
    Subatomic
    Supports
    Sustainability
    Taxes
    TCNJ
    Teachers
    Telecom
    Therapy
    Thermodynamics
    Transportation
    Undergraduate
    USEDA
    Verizon
    Video Game
    Virtual Reality
    Water
    WHO
    William Paterson
    Women In STEM
    Workforce Development

Home   Coalition   News   Resources   Events   Join Us
Picture
Innovation New Jersey Coalition
10 West Lafayette Street
Trenton, NJ 08608-2002
609-858-9507